Open azaroth42 opened 7 years ago
Needs a proposal, or could defer until 3.1 if there's insufficient interest?
Is it just description
?
Now summary
according to #1242. I think so? Just a case of documenting this in the definition?
Discussion on 11/22 call:
Question: Where does this actually live? Doesn't go on the image's info.json, not per tile, nor on the canvas which could have many images or time based media. Need to recognize that we're building an application, not a replacement for and need different solutions to just an alt text property.
No consensus as to the correct way forwards.
Per comments by me and @workergnome on 22 Nov call:
summary
. Doing so places probably undesirable semantic constraints on summary
.Use case here: https://github.com/IIIF/api/issues/1777#issuecomment-462977980
Finally, a text version should be provided for screen readers so that all users are aware of the content and purpose of the image.
Some text that is more descriptive than label
seems like it could go with a logo, or any other image or a/v content for that matter
Editors agree it's important, especially with 3d that adds even more accessibility issues. Would be good to have an informed and holistic solution, perhaps via a new TSG?
Dropped into Slack #a11y
Editors have been discussing https://github.com/IIIF/api/issues/1288 But needs a wider discussion. There are a set of aria-* tags that a IIIF client might expose, drawing them from IIIF properties, but what are those properties and what are the mappings?
Content resources might not be accessible to all users, such as images for users with visual impairments or audio for those with auditory impairment. The resource can have a label, but this is not the same thing -- a textual representation of an audio file is not the name of the audio file.
The property should allow internationalized text, following the languageMap (#755) decision.