Open hadro opened 3 years ago
I think we should discuss this during the next Fall Working Meeting and have a dedicated Awesome IIIF session where we make decision and prune the repo. I am not against the idea of adding a date, but we are so few curating this list that this (new) work involved will, in my opinion, be counterproductive if we do not succeed in recruiting other people.
Lightest-weight approach probably best, perhaps a combo of bullets 2 and 3 above: Using 🆕 (or something more exciting) and wiping it every year or semi-annually
There seems to be consensus that alphabetical ordering of the sub-lists is the most manageable long-term as this list continues to grow, while still acknowledging that alpha sort does remove some defacto information whether that by maintainer-recommended items appearing first, or just having the sub-lists be chronological.
See also #149 on the topic of order-based recommendations, and also discussion on IIIF Slack #Curators-of-Awesome channel
Possibilities include:
Creating this issue to continue that discussion, while not blocking the consensus around #301, which seems to solve some immediate confusion around additions to the list