Model comparison

[cch388]

When comparing two models, sometimes only the model of which name is alphabetically listed beforehand shows the impulse response.

Example 1:

1. Tick US_AJ16 and US_BKM12
2. Tick Taylor
3. Tick Technology shock
4. Tick Inflation
5. The interface says that technology shock (ea and eps_z) are unavailable for the models (see screenshot below).
6. Only US_AJ16 impulse response appears as A is alphabetically before B (see screenshot below).

Example 2:

1. Tick US_AJ16 and EA_ALSV06
2. Tick Taylor
3. Tick Technology shock
4. Tick Inflation
5. The interface says that technology shock (epsz and epsz) are unavailable for the models (see screenshot below).
6. Only EA_ALSV06 impulse response appears as E is alphabetically before U (see screenshot below).

But sometimes the alphabetical order doesn't matter.

Example 3:

1. Tick US_BKM12 and US_CCTW10
2. Tick Taylor
3. Tick Technology shock
4. Tick Inflation
5. Both US_BKM12 and US_CCTW10 impulse response appear (see screenshot below).

However, if just simulating one individual, impulse response appears anyways.

Example 4:

1. Tick US_BKM12
2. Tick Taylor
3. Tick Technology shock
4. Tick Inflation
5. US_BKM12 impulse response appears (but it's not shown when comparing with US_AJ16).

[cch388]

Jonas also has the same problem btw. And I am running all these on my Macbook with MatLab.

[j2L4e]

fixed.

The interface says that technology shock (ea and eps_z) are unavailable for the models (see screenshot below).

The way shocks are selected and passed to the backend wasn't designed for "same text/different name" kinds of shocks as this came up very recently, so the script warns about some of them not being available. It's a cosmetic thing.

[j2L4e]

Btw, these are not correctly named in master, yet. You'll need to fix #66 for that