Open hkawaji opened 9 years ago
I don't much like having 'animal cell' as a grouping, but so long as it's there in CL we should make sure we are complete
I filed this as an upstream ticket for now https://code.google.com/p/cell-ontology/issues/detail?id=178
from MdH:
These samples are missing the annotation "animal cell" and "eukaryotic cell": 11274-116H5 Melanocyte - light, donor1 11351-117H1 Melanocyte - light, donor2 11423-118G1 Melanocyte - light, donor3 11281-116I3 Skeletal Muscle Cells, donor1 11358-117H8 Skeletal Muscle Cells, donor2 11430-118G8 Skeletal Muscle Cells, donor3 11240-116D7 Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells, donor1 11321-117D7 Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells, donor2 11397-118D2 Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells, donor3
I am not sure at what level in the hierarchy "animal cell" should appear; maybe at "pigment cell" for melanocytes and "cell of skeletal muscle" for the skeletal muscle / satellite cells?