We do not do a great job of showing how the KGCL data model aligns with prior work
There is a really excellent summary here:
Romana Pernisch, Daniele Dell’Aglio, Abraham Bernstein,
Beware of the hierarchy — An analysis of ontology evolution and the materialisation impact for biomedical ontologies,
Journal of Web Semantics,
Volume 70,
2021,
100658,
ISSN 1570-8268,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100658.
One of the major contributions of Pernisch et al is looking at impact of entailed axioms - currently our focus is on structural diffs but we should include this
There is also a lot of great stuff in this paper with metrics for ontology contributions and usages, cc @matentzn
We do not do a great job of showing how the KGCL data model aligns with prior work
There is a really excellent summary here:
Romana Pernisch, Daniele Dell’Aglio, Abraham Bernstein, Beware of the hierarchy — An analysis of ontology evolution and the materialisation impact for biomedical ontologies, Journal of Web Semantics, Volume 70, 2021, 100658, ISSN 1570-8268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100658.
This summarizes earlier work by Noy et al e.g https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel-Klein/publication/2930642_A_Component-Based_Framework_for_Ontology_Evolution/links/0912f50ba15cd1a7e5000000/A-Component-Based-Framework-for-Ontology-Evolution.pdf as well as COntoDiff
One of the major contributions of Pernisch et al is looking at impact of entailed axioms - currently our focus is on structural diffs but we should include this
There is also a lot of great stuff in this paper with metrics for ontology contributions and usages, cc @matentzn