Presentation peer review

[Aravind-shrenivas]

The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Feature Finders Club. The team members that participated in this review are

• Eshaan Mathakari - @eshaanmathakari

• Sanjay Bhargav Siddi - @sanjaybhargavsiddi

• Likith Kumar Dundigalla - @LikithKumarDundigalla

• Aravind shrenivas Murali - @Aravind-shrenivas

• Vamsi Vadala - @Vamsi-Vadala

• Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? yes

• Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? One doubt we have is that the team mentioned the density plot is a Uniform distribution, but the disaster plot is a bimodal distribution.

• Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project? Yes.

• Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.? most of the slides are full of text.

• Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project? yes, it was professional, it appears to be practiced. no one was reading off a script. and everyone got a chance to contribute to the presentation

[poojithapasala]

Suggested changes were made.