The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Team Crimson. The team members that participated in this review are
Mohit Rakesh Taparia] - @mohit-taparia
Jasdeep Singh Jhajj - @Jasdeep-Singh-Jhajj
Arun Koundinya Parasa - @ArunKoundinya
Pradnya Ramesh Raut - @PradnyaR24
Varun Soni - @solitudevedhas
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Yes, the research questions were well framed and the data used to address the designed questions perfectly aligns.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
Yes the visualizations were pretty much clear and easily understandable. For first Question they have create different Bar Plot along with Trend line using geom smooth and for second question they have created heat map which showcase refugee count for different countries across the world using geom_map.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
Yes, the project seems to be pretty well thought out. The planning and implementation of the project appear to have taken considerable time and effort. It is evident that some strong research and analysis have been performed before finalizing the plots.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
The slides look perfectly aligned and organized. The transition between slides is also great. From start to end, there is not a single boring slide in their presentation. There are some plots where the x-axis is getting cut-off and not getting displayed fully, which can be rectified. Another point to be taken care is the Plot4 Title is not fully displayed due to the plot size so the title needs to be fixed so that it does not go beyond the viewer limits.
The slides for Question two seems a little more heavier in text than first question, although they didn't go through each palet while explaining.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
Presentation was quite good and they were able to connect with audience and explain in a clear way. It seems the presentation was well practiced, no one was reading off a script. All of them did get a chance to participate in the presentation.
The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Team Crimson. The team members that participated in this review are
Mohit Rakesh Taparia] - @mohit-taparia
Jasdeep Singh Jhajj - @Jasdeep-Singh-Jhajj
Arun Koundinya Parasa - @ArunKoundinya
Pradnya Ramesh Raut - @PradnyaR24
Varun Soni - @solitudevedhas
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? Yes, the research questions were well framed and the data used to address the designed questions perfectly aligns.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? Yes the visualizations were pretty much clear and easily understandable. For first Question they have create different Bar Plot along with Trend line using geom smooth and for second question they have created heat map which showcase refugee count for different countries across the world using geom_map.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project? Yes, the project seems to be pretty well thought out. The planning and implementation of the project appear to have taken considerable time and effort. It is evident that some strong research and analysis have been performed before finalizing the plots.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.? The slides look perfectly aligned and organized. The transition between slides is also great. From start to end, there is not a single boring slide in their presentation. There are some plots where the x-axis is getting cut-off and not getting displayed fully, which can be rectified. Another point to be taken care is the Plot4 Title is not fully displayed due to the plot size so the title needs to be fixed so that it does not go beyond the viewer limits. The slides for Question two seems a little more heavier in text than first question, although they didn't go through each palet while explaining.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project? Presentation was quite good and they were able to connect with audience and explain in a clear way. It seems the presentation was well practiced, no one was reading off a script. All of them did get a chance to participate in the presentation.