Code peer review - Githubissues

INFO-526-S24 / project-final-GraphGeeks

https://info-526-s24.github.io/project-final-GraphGeeks/

3 stars 0 forks source link

Code peer review #6

Closed Melissajiayue closed 4 months ago

Melissajiayue commented 4 months ago

The following is the peer review of the project code by [name of team completing peer review]. The team members that participated in this review are

Varun Sahdev - @solitudevedhas
Sanja Dmitrovic - @sdmitrovic
Naitik Shah - @naitik2608
Mohammad Farmani - @mfarmani95
Jiayue - @Melissajiayue
Vidhyananth - @Vidhyananth Sivashanmugam

1. Purpose of Code

[ ] Clearly defined and understood
[ ✅] Ambiguous or unclear

2. Code Quality

[✅ ] Code is clean, readable, and well-organized
[ ] Adequate comments explaining complex or tricky code sections
[✅ ] Variables, methods, and classes have meaningful names
[ ✅] Consistent code style (indentation, naming conventions, etc.)

3. Documentation

[ ] Code documentation (e.g., comments) is sufficient
[ ] Readme or other documentation updated if necessary

4. Best Practices

[✅ ] No hardcoded values; constants used appropriately
[✅ ] Security and privacy concerns addressed (e.g., no sensitive data exposed)
[✅ ] Code avoids repetition and promotes reusability

5. Additional Comments

Please provide feedback, areas of improvement, or other observations.

Add more comments which helps readers to understand what the chunk of code is doing. And it helpful for debugging. Please update the readme file later. Put the link to Github page to the icon on your website.

6. Recommendation

[ ] Approved - ready to be merged
[ ✅] Approved with minor issues - can be addressed later
[ ] Requires changes - provide feedback and request another review

Gowtham-18 commented 4 months ago

Certainly! I agree that adding more detailed comments will help readers to understand the code even more. Will update the readme file too. Thanks for the feedback!