The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Datavista. The team members that participated in this review are
[AkashSrinivasan]-@AkashSrinivasan12
[ABHISHEK KUMAR]-@Abhi291712
[lakshmineharika]-@lakshmineharika
[Divyadhole]-@Divyadhole
[Noureen Mithaigar]-@musketer26
[gowthamtheeda]-@gowthamtheeda
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Yes, the questions were well-designed, and the data used was relevant to the research question.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
yes they used appropriate visualizations and interpret them accurately
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time
and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
They planned the project well, using API calls to obtain live data statistics. Although there may have been limitations as
mentioned in the Presentation , their approach was out of the box
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
Yes, they used figures where needed. Slides were organised.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
The team presented well. Yes, the presentation seemed to be practiced. Everyone said meaningful things about the
project
kANNISTER
commented
6 months ago
The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Datavista. The team members that participated in this review are
[AkashSrinivasan]-@AkashSrinivasan12
[ABHISHEK KUMAR]-@Abhi291712
[lakshmineharika]-@lakshmineharika
[Divyadhole]-@Divyadhole
[Noureen Mithaigar]-@musketer26
[gowthamtheeda]-@gowthamtheeda
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? Yes, the questions were well-designed, and the data used was relevant to the research question.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? yes they used appropriate visualizations and interpret them accurately
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project? They planned the project well, using API calls to obtain live data statistics. Although there may have been limitations as mentioned in the Presentation , their approach was out of the box
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.? Yes, they used figures where needed. Slides were organised.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project? The team presented well. Yes, the presentation seemed to be practiced. Everyone said meaningful things about the project