Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Yes, the dataset used is relevant enough to their research approach and plots being made. They have mentioned their research question in slides, and they have made their analysis/approach on showcasing police shooting using different concise plots and interactive dashboard.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
Yes, they have made correct use of plots and interactive mapping heatmap with annotating the details on each point.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
Neat and clean & easy-to-use grasp visualization implementation developed to allow for interactivity for all graph types which was good.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
All slides was well organized, it was easy to see the entire plot along with the legend at all times.
The slides could benefit from shorter sentences to allow for more time to be spent on the plots themselves.
Good conclusion breakdown for visualization interpretations
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
The team's presentation exuded a commendable level of professionalism, leaving a lasting impression on the audience. From the outset, it was evident that the team had invested considerable effort in preparation. Their delivery was polished and confident, demonstrating a deep understanding of the subject matter.
The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by VizMasters. The team members that participated in this review are
[Kondapaneni Siva Rohit ] - @[Sivarohitk]
[Rohit Vatsava Kalakala] - @[Rohit-Vatsava]
[Miki Katyal] - @[MIKIKATYAL]
[Ajay Kumar] - @[AjaykATgithub]
[Surya Vardhan Dama] - @[suryavardhandama]
[Monica Tejaswi Kommareddy] - @[KommareddyMonicaTejaswi] ...
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? Yes, the dataset used is relevant enough to their research approach and plots being made. They have mentioned their research question in slides, and they have made their analysis/approach on showcasing police shooting using different concise plots and interactive dashboard.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? Yes, they have made correct use of plots and interactive mapping heatmap with annotating the details on each point.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project? Neat and clean & easy-to-use grasp visualization implementation developed to allow for interactivity for all graph types which was good.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
All slides was well organized, it was easy to see the entire plot along with the legend at all times. The slides could benefit from shorter sentences to allow for more time to be spent on the plots themselves. Good conclusion breakdown for visualization interpretations