Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Yes, the research question is well-designed. The data used was also relevant to the research question.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
The team could have used a visualization more representative to the changes over time for the year variable, in question 1 (for example a line graph, however, a bar plot was used instead. The interpretation of the barplot was however done accurately.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
Yes the project was carefully thought out and it does appear a lot of time and effort went into the project.
-The limitations of the project were not however stated.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
The slides were well done and organized, the texts were concise, all visualizations were well made and legends and labels were used where necessary.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
The team presented well. The presentation seemed well practiced and eveyone had a chance to speak which they did excellently while speaking off script.
The following is the peer review of the presenation by team algo aces. The team members who participated in this review are
Valerie Naa Dei Okine - @valerie-okine
Tanya George - @tanyageorge
Say Navya Reddy - @navyareddy152
Monica Tejaswi Kommareddy- @KommareddyMonicaTejaswi
Gowtham Theeda - @gowthamtheeda
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question? Yes, the research question is well-designed. The data used was also relevant to the research question.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately? The team could have used a visualization more representative to the changes over time for the year variable, in question 1 (for example a line graph, however, a bar plot was used instead. The interpretation of the barplot was however done accurately.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
Yes the project was carefully thought out and it does appear a lot of time and effort went into the project.
-The limitations of the project were not however stated.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
The slides were well done and organized, the texts were concise, all visualizations were well made and legends and labels were used where necessary.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
The team presented well. The presentation seemed well practiced and eveyone had a chance to speak which they did excellently while speaking off script.