[ YES ] Code functions as intended and produces the expected outcome
[ ] Edge cases have been considered and handled
[ ] No obvious bugs or issues found
4. Testing
[YES ] Adequate unit tests covering key functionality
[ ] Tests are clear and can be easily understood
[ ] All tests pass successfully
5. Documentation
[ ] Code documentation (e.g., docstrings, comments) is sufficient
[YES ] Readme or other documentation updated if necessary
6. Best Practices
[ YES ] No hardcoded values; constants used appropriately
[YES ] Security and privacy concerns addressed (e.g., no sensitive data exposed)
[ YES] Code avoids repetition and promotes reusability
7. Additional Comments
In EDA please increase the appropriate comments and also in the bar plot for mean transaction amount please make sure the numbers are visible and inside the boundary. And maybe fill the box plot with different colors. Please delete unnecessary code chunks in the feature selection.
8. Recommendation
[ ] Approved - ready to be merged
[ yes] Approved with minor issues - can be addressed later
[ ] Requires changes - provide feedback and request another review
The following is the peer review of the project proposal by [KG Competitors]. The team members who participated in this review are:
[]Gorantla Sai Laasya] - @[Sailaasya-1]
[Surya Vardhan Dama] - @[suryavardhandama]
[Maksim Kulik] - @[@h-akston]
[Remi Hendershott] - @[remisublette]
[Monica Tejaswi Kommareddy] - @[KommareddyMonicaTejaswi]
[Shashank Yadav] - @[xinformatics]
[Priom Mahmud] - @[Priom1996]
1. Purpose of Code
2. Code Quality
3. Functionality
4. Testing
5. Documentation
6. Best Practices
7. Additional Comments
8. Recommendation