Presentation peer review by Mining Minds

The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Mining Minds. The team members who participated in this review are

Omid Zandi Roxana Akbarsharifi Nandhini Anne Deema Albluwi Sai Navya Reddy Busireddy Gowtham Gopalakrishnan

Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?

The research question is excellently designed, and the data used is highly relevant and well-integrated into the study, providing a strong foundation for the analysis.

Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?

The team employed appropriate and effective visualizations that were well-interpreted, enhancing the clarity and impact of the findings.

Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?

The project is meticulously thought out with a clear understanding of its limitations. It is evident that considerable time and effort were dedicated to both the planning and implementation stages.

Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?

The slides are exceptionally well-organized and visually appealing. They maintain a balance between text and visuals, ensuring that all figures are easily understandable with clear labels and legends.

Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?

The presentation was delivered with outstanding professionalism. The team appeared well-prepared, and each member contributed meaningfully to the discussion, reflecting a thorough understanding of the project.

INFO523-S24 / project-final-datadetectives

Presentation peer review by Mining Minds #7