The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Visual Virtuosos. The team members that participated in this review are
Jothish Kumar Polaki - @Jothish21
Partha Koundinya P - @partha-pkp
Kashyap Sai Prasad Nadendla - @KashyapNadendla
Harshit Mehra - @harshitmehra1
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Yes, the questions are well designed and the data is relevant to the questions.
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
Team has created good and appropriate visualizations and the plots are interpreted accurately.
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
The project is thoroughly planned out and implemented accordingly, the limitations are also carefully considered.
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
The slides are well organized, are readable, and has sufficient text. All the plots are labelled and legends are relevant.
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?
The presentation is great and they deserve marks for the way they presented, it appeared to be well practiced. It did not feel like scripted, and everyone has a good contribution in the project.
The following is the peer review of the Presentation proposal by Visual Virtuosos. The team members that participated in this review are
Jothish Kumar Polaki - @Jothish21
Partha Koundinya P - @partha-pkp
Kashyap Sai Prasad Nadendla - @KashyapNadendla
Harshit Mehra - @harshitmehra1
Content: Is the research question well designed and is the data being used relevant to the research question?
Content: Did the team use appropriate visualizations and did they interpret them accurately?
Creativity and Critical Thought: Is the project carefully thought out? Are the limitations carefully considered? Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project?
Slides: Are the slides well organized, readable, not full of text, featuring figures with legible labels, legends, etc.?
Professionalism: How well did the team present? Does the presentation appear to be well practiced? Are they reading off of a script? Did everyone get a chance to say something meaningful about the project?