[x] Code documentation (e.g., comments) is sufficient
[x] Readme or other documentation updated if necessary
4. Best Practices
[x] No hardcoded values; constants used appropriately
[x] Security and privacy concerns addressed (e.g., no sensitive data exposed)
[ ] Code avoids repetition and promotes reusability
5. Additional Comments
Please provide feedback, areas of improvement, or other observations.
The libraries are imported twice, once using `pacman and then lines [102-104] have repeated imports of some packages.
6. Recommendation
[ ] Approved - ready to be merged
[x] Approved with minor issues - can be addressed later
[ ] Requires changes - provide feedback and request another review
The following is the peer review of the project code by [name of team completing peer review]. The team members that participated in this review are
[Visalakshi Iyer] - @visalakshi2001
[Megan Hokama] - @meganhokama
[Sai Madhuri Kandula] - @ksmadhuri
[Kiwoon Hong] - @KiwoonHong
[Tejashwini Kasa] - @TejashwiniKasa
1. Purpose of Code
2. Code Quality
3. Documentation
4. Best Practices
5. Additional Comments
Please provide feedback, areas of improvement, or other observations. The libraries are imported twice, once using `pacman and then lines [102-104] have repeated imports of some packages.
6. Recommendation