[ ] reference vs. upscaled model: sketches and parameters
see arxiv Fig 1
[x] A: replace sketches by simplified ones
B: decide for most striking parameters to show: neuron numbers, in-degrees, external in-degrees (further parameters could also be visualized in appendix)
[ ] reference vs. upscaled model: raster plots
see arxiv Fig 2
do not show intermediate state
86
91
[ ] decide for final state of upscaled model (maybe start with Hannah's MC and scale this one up?)
[ ] reference vs. upscaled model: statistics
see arxiv Fig 3
[ ] decide for final state of upscaled model
[ ] parameter spaces
see arxiv Fig 4
postponed (lots of work, not sure if worth it, no full circle with LFP results, could be reduced to just showing a few distinct states if at all)
[ ] evoked activity
see arxiv Fig 5
show only one parameter combination
postponed to decide if parameter scan should be kept
[ ] morphologies
see arxiv Fig 6
consider newer morphologies?
[ ] illustration and traces for LFP
see arXiv Fig 7
[ ] 3D sketch with electrodes
[x] show traces from 3 locations (color-coded), two neighbors and one far away
[x] add PSDs from arxiv Fig 8 (maybe individual traces from chosen electrodes)
[ ] distance-dependent correlations
see arxiv Fig 8
[ ] keep only lower row of arxiv Fig 8, make this only about the correlations
[ ] distance-dependent coherences
see arxiv Fig 9
keep (hope to get the gamma band back with new parameters)
86
91