Question changes TG Download regarding Atom

INSPIRE-MIF / gp-data-service-linking-simplification

Good Practice on a consensus-based simplified approach for INSPIRE data and service linkages

7 stars 12 forks source link

Question changes TG Download regarding Atom #62

Closed heidivanparys closed 1 year ago

heidivanparys commented 2 years ago

What would the concrete changes for the TG Download regarding Atom be?

For WFS and WMS, a third scenario will be added. For Atom, would the changes be

an update of 5.1.3 Download Service Feed: feed „link‟ element – service metadata
an update of the table below

AntoRot commented 2 years ago

As external ISO 19139 service metadata (referred in the section 5.1.3) is no longer provided for services in the simplification approach, I think that the changes affecting Atom services should be an update of the section 5.1 (before the sub-sections 5.1.1, 5.1.2, ...) and of the Table 17 by adding the new mapping elements agreed in the subgroup and describing the simplification approach. Consequently, the feed "link" element for service metadata (referred to in section 5.1.3) should be used only by the providers that don't follow the simplification approach (for the reason explained above).

heidivanparys commented 1 year ago

Ok, then I actually think that we need two scenarios for Atom:

the first one is the current approach, so we don't break anything for existing implementations, thus keep Table 17, and have TG requirement 6 in this scenario (only)
and the second one is the new and simplified approach, with a new table having the contents as described at https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/gp-data-service-linking-simplification/blob/main/proposals/Part-B-team/Consolidated-proposal-Part-B.md#atom-2

MarieLambois commented 1 year ago

Yes I agree, the scenario will be really close but still it seems clearer to have 2 scenarios just like in the other services.

AntoRot commented 1 year ago

I agree too. But, besides the new table, we need also revise some requirements such as the TG Requirement 6 in the section 5.1.3, as suggested for the conformity element (see https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/gp-data-service-linking-simplification/blob/main/proposals/Part-B-team/Consolidated-proposal-Part-B.md#35-conformity-)

heidivanparys commented 1 year ago

I updated https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/gp-data-service-linking-simplification/issues/63, please review.

heidivanparys commented 1 year ago

Closing this issue, see https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines/issues/105.