INSPIRE-MIF / helpdesk-validator

Community discussion forum for INSPIRE validation issues
42 stars 23 forks source link

IACS Temporal reference - Citation date #927

Closed m2fuhrmann closed 1 year ago

m2fuhrmann commented 1 year ago

Select the INSPIRE resource you would like to test

Select the Technical Guidelines version

Select the type of metadata record(s) to be tested

Select the conformance classes to be assessed

3.) upload the XML-file and start the test : 2022-12-01_9e95f21f-4ecf-4682-9a44-e5f7609f6fa0.zip

So both variants (Date and DateTime) should be possible. However, the test fails on DateTime.

X-Path: /gmd:MD_Metadata/gmd:identificationInfo/gmd:MD_DataIdentification/gmd:citation/gmd:CI_Citation/gmd:date/gmd:CI_Date/gmd:date/gco:DateTime

<gmd:date>
    <gmd:CI_Date>
        <gmd:date>
            <gco:DateTime>2022-06-24T00:00:00.000+02:00</gco:DateTime>
        </gmd:date>
        <gmd:dateType>
            <gmd:CI_DateTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode" codeListValue="revision"/>
        </gmd:dateType>
    </gmd:CI_Date>
</gmd:date>

Could you check that please?

Thanks & regards.

fabiovinci commented 1 year ago

Dear @m2fuhrmann,

thank you for opening the issue.

You are right, the test should pass even if the <gco:DateTime> element is used.

We will review the related ATS and ETS and notify you when the fix is available in staging.

arantzaetxebarria commented 1 year ago

Dear @m2fuhrmann

A solution has been implemented and now is present in staging environment. Could you please verify and check that now is working as expected? Thanks

Regards

fabiovinci commented 1 year ago

Dear all,

I tested the fix in the staging instance and it works fine.