Closed JuliaSprenger closed 3 years ago
sooo @JuliaSprenger, shall we merge at this point, or do you prefer to continue this PR?
I would like to integrate the new code into the existing csv -> ando code, to not have different pieces of code for the same purpose. I will keep you updated here.
@Slowblitz The tests are failing for dataset7, which according to your tests should not be a valid AnDO dataset. However, I am not sure exactly why this dataset is not considered valid. Maybe I am missing a detail here?
@SylvainTakerkart , checks are passing now !
@SylvainTakerkart , checks are passing now !
ok, good ;)
@Slowblitz @JuliaSprenger let me know explicitly when you need something to be reviewed, or when I can merge...
Ready to merge from my side. I think it makes sense to merge this first and do potential improvement in the DigLab2AnDO context in a separate PR, since this one is already quite old and big.
ok!!! Merging!!
This PR is still work in progress, but open to comments regarding the general approach already.
It aims at providing a mechanism to set up an AnDO compatible folder structure independent of the input format used for defining the experiment, subject and session infos.
TODOs:
check_Path
function for raw/meta/derived folders (-> fix failing test)diglab2ando
module -> add dictionary based Generator interface (postponed to future PR)