IO500 / io500

IO500 Storage Benchmark source code
MIT License
95 stars 30 forks source link

find_hard spams stdout #49

Open carlilek opened 2 years ago

carlilek commented 2 years ago

When using Extended mode, the find_hard section spams the stdout with found files, e.g.

/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.99.701
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.97.1010
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.99.601
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.99.801
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.98.1011
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.0.1001
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.97.1012
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.97.1011
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.98.801
/nrs/scicompsys/io500-sc21/datadir/2021.10.22-12.17.03/mdtest-hard//test-dir.0-0/mdtest_tree.0/file.mdtest.99.501

This makes it hard to check scores while a run is going.

JulianKunkel commented 2 years ago

Can it be that you added -v / debug option to this IO500 phase for testing of the already resolved issue? Please check your ini file, and if it remains, share it! Thanks.

carlilek commented 2 years ago

Nope, no debug options or -v specified. I tried turning down my verbosity from 2 to 1, but I've had it at 2 forever, and in any case, this didn't make any difference. This only occurs on the find-hard phase, not on the find or find-easy.

Here's the ini file:

config-hhmi.txt

carlilek commented 2 years ago

Has anyone else seen this? I'm still getting it, even with isc22_v1

JulianKunkel commented 1 year ago

Thanks for reporting this. Could you send a sample output?