Format as Technical Guideline or change the headers to a different type of document

[rkrug]

@Stokpaardje @niamir @yanisica

• [x] It needs to be decided, if the Ontology is a technical guideline, in which case the naming and formatting should follow the TG naming and template file, or a different type of document, in which case the header in the document should be changed. The more I look at it, I do not think this should be a technical guideline, but an Ontology. The naming is fine - so other ontologies in IPBES would either have the name structure IPBES_Ontology_whatever or added to this ontology (probably the best). We should put some thought into the formatting of the html and the yaml frontmatter and possibly a makefile to compile all targets.

• [ ] Also, I would suggest that only the current version should be here as source (md) file, named e.g. _current and older ones should only be here as compiled versions (html, pdf, ttl) in a subfolder with the version as an appendix (_v1 as it is).

• [ ] It needs to be decided what the website should be - a README as it is plus a list of links to current and older versions would be my suggestion.

[niamir]

thanks Rainer the Ontology is not a technical guideline. We are not expecting other ontologies in IPBES. it is going to be IPBES_Ontology and we keep updating it.