Closed posixeleni closed 1 month ago
Still a bug as of 4.6.1. Here's the file: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/blob/v4.6.1/scripts/api/data/metadatablocks/astrophysics.tsv
Enquiring minds are curious about the source of the controlled vocabulary for astrotype.
@johnhuck here you go:
https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/blob/v4.18/scripts/api/data/metadatablocks/astrophysics.tsv#L30
Pull requests welcome! 😄
thanks, @pdurbin - yes, but where did this list of type values originate? is it from a standard? was it created locally?
@johnhuck oh! For that you'd go to http://guides.dataverse.org/en/4.18/user/appendix.html#metadata-references
@pdurbin Of course! I'm sorry, I thought we'd already checked there. Looks like the terms are primarily from the VO schema, rather than the IVOA (there's some overlap between the VO and IVOA types, but not much, which is curious).
I don't see the values Figure
, PrettyPicture
, Documentation
, and Press Release
in the VO list (although IVOA has Press
), but the VO document says the list is extensible, so I guess we can assume they were introduced somewhere along the way. Perhaps not important at this point. Thanks for the assist!
To focus on the most important features and bugs, we are closing issues created before 2020 (version 5.0) that are not new feature requests with the label 'Type: Feature'.
If you created this issue and you feel the team should revisit this decision, please reopen the issue and leave a comment.
Field Display Name: RedshiftType -> Redshift Type (also fix in the field description as well)
Controlled Vocabulary for Type:
Also a good opportunity to add identifiers in the controlled vocabulary