IRTF-HRPC / draft-guidelines

1 stars 1 forks source link

Pseudonymity vs. Anonymity #7

Closed ekr closed 1 year ago

ekr commented 1 year ago

I think the text around anonymity and pseudonymity is very confusing because it is difficult to cleanly separate these two concepts. In particular, both sections talk about IP addressed based identifiers. What kind of identifier do you think an IP address is? It seems to me that that there is an argument for either in this context, depending on how it is assigned (e.g., home versus mobile).

I find the discussion of ODoH particularly confusing because that is not about pseudonymity but about simply deleting the IP address, so why isn't this in anonymity?

IMO this text should be restructured to address the relevant privacy concepts, and in particular that identifiers are on a continuum of space (the number of people who it might refer to), time (the stability of the identifier), and locality (the set of contexts in which they apply). Once you have done that, I think it will be easier to locate the various points in the spectrum and discuss the various countermeasures.

Example: Generally, pseudonymous identifiers cannot be simply reverse engineered. Some early approaches took approaches such as simple hashing of IP addresses, but these could then be simply reversed by generating a hash for each potential IP address and comparing it to the pseudonym.

This is not entirely true for v6 addresses.

You should replace the reference to ODoH with one to O-HTTP.

gurshabad commented 1 year ago

Thanks, @ekr. Replacing the reference to ODoH to O-HTTP.

I think for the other stuff, I don't disagree at all. A great starting point that I would welcome is a PR on this issue, whenever you have time.

ekr commented 1 year ago

SG. I'll try to work something up this week. Can you please assign this to me and mark it PR-Wanted (I don't have permissions).

ekr commented 1 year ago

I don't think this is completed. Please re-open.

nllz commented 1 year ago

Ah ok - sorry about that. There is no PR for this yet, right?

nllz commented 1 year ago

We are still waiting for a PR from @ekr on this, right?

ekr commented 1 year ago

Yes. I have the AI on this.

ekr commented 1 year ago

See https://github.com/IRTF-HRPC/draft-guidelines/pull/12

gurshabad commented 1 year ago

Excellent edits, thank you!