IRTF-PEARG / draft-ip-address-privacy

Internet-Draft on IP address privacy
http://pearg.org/draft-ip-address-privacy/
Other
17 stars 5 forks source link

Privacy law #26

Closed ggx closed 2 years ago

ggx commented 2 years ago

The privacy-law branch basically contains an update on section 3.3 IP Privacy Protection and Law. It covers the following main examples:

Fixed as well few typos here and there in the rest of the document.

ggx commented 2 years ago

Thanks! This is seems like a good addition

I did push a new commit addressing the comments.

ggx commented 2 years ago

Hi,

On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?

On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?

Ciao

L.

arichiv commented 2 years ago

On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?

I'm suggesting that the 'IP Privacy Law' section becomes the table and a paragraph explaining why the different points of comparison were picked. Focusing on paragraph summaries of specific laws will make this harder to review I think.

On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?

Under 'Next-User Implications' and a couple other sections you made minor wording fixes. If those were split out into another PR instead of being bundled with this one they would be approved quickly.

bslassey commented 2 years ago

On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?

I'm suggesting that the 'IP Privacy Law' section becomes the table and a paragraph explaining why the different points of comparison were picked. Focusing on paragraph summaries of specific laws will make this harder to review I think.

On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?

Under 'Next-User Implications' and a couple other sections you made minor wording fixes. If those were split out into another PR instead of being bundled with this one they would be approved quickly.

Big +1 to both of these suggestions.