Closed ggx closed 2 years ago
Thanks! This is seems like a good addition
I did push a new commit addressing the comments.
Hi,
On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?
On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?
Ciao
L.
On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?
I'm suggesting that the 'IP Privacy Law' section becomes the table and a paragraph explaining why the different points of comparison were picked. Focusing on paragraph summaries of specific laws will make this harder to review I think.
On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?
Under 'Next-User Implications' and a couple other sections you made minor wording fixes. If those were split out into another PR instead of being bundled with this one they would be approved quickly.
On point 2: The table is great idea I'll put it at the end of the section as a summary, what do you think?
I'm suggesting that the 'IP Privacy Law' section becomes the table and a paragraph explaining why the different points of comparison were picked. Focusing on paragraph summaries of specific laws will make this harder to review I think.
On point 1: not sure what you are asking to be done, can you detail?
Under 'Next-User Implications' and a couple other sections you made minor wording fixes. If those were split out into another PR instead of being bundled with this one they would be approved quickly.
Big +1 to both of these suggestions.
The privacy-law branch basically contains an update on section 3.3 IP Privacy Protection and Law. It covers the following main examples:
Fixed as well few typos here and there in the rest of the document.