search

ISA-tools / BioInvIndex

The web application, model, database persistence, services package and web services for the BII. Led by Eamonn Maguire (Uni. of Oxford) & Philippe Rocca-Serra (Uni. of Oxford).
http://www.isa-tools.org
16 stars 13 forks source link

Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order #47

Closed HazelMurphy closed 12 years ago

HazelMurphy commented 12 years ago

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

eamonnmag commented 12 years ago

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

HazelMurphy commented 12 years ago

Hi Eamonn

It is not validator that is the issue, as I have not used ISAvalidator in this work. I attach some printscreens which I could not to the main issue list so you can see what I am seeing.

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:10 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017243

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

eamonnmag commented 12 years ago

They are all part of the same package. The data manager, validator and converter are controlled by the same source.

https://github.com/ISA-tools/ISAvalidator-ISAconverter-BIImanager

So if this is a bug in the data manager, it should be lodged here, not in the BioInvIndex. It's a separate tool.

On 17 February 2012 09:13, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Hi Eamonn

It is not validator that is the issue, as I have not used ISAvalidator in this work. I attach some printscreens which I could not to the main issue list so you can see what I am seeing.

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:10 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017243

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017281

Eamonn Maguire
Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center
7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

HazelMurphy commented 12 years ago

Apologies Eamonn I thought I had logged this under Data manager. Is there an easy way to move the issues I have logged or do I need to re log and close the wrongly allocated bugs?

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:26 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

They are all part of the same package. The data manager, validator and converter are controlled by the same source.

https://github.com/ISA-tools/ISAvalidator-ISAconverter-BIImanager

So if this is a bug in the data manager, it should be lodged here, not in the BioInvIndex. It's a separate tool.

On 17 February 2012 09:13, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Hi Eamonn

It is not validator that is the issue, as I have not used ISAvalidator in this work. I attach some printscreens which I could not to the main issue list so you can see what I am seeing.

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:10 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401724 3

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401728 1

Eamonn Maguire
Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center
7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017420

eamonnmag commented 12 years ago

Yea, unfortunately so :(

Thanks,

Eamonn

On 17 February 2012 09:28, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Apologies Eamonn I thought I had logged this under Data manager. Is there an easy way to move the issues I have logged or do I need to re log and close the wrongly allocated bugs?

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:26 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

They are all part of the same package. The data manager, validator and converter are controlled by the same source.

https://github.com/ISA-tools/ISAvalidator-ISAconverter-BIImanager

So if this is a bug in the data manager, it should be lodged here, not in the BioInvIndex. It's a separate tool.

On 17 February 2012 09:13, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Hi Eamonn

It is not validator that is the issue, as I have not used ISAvalidator in this work. I attach some printscreens which I could not to the main issue list so you can see what I am seeing.

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:10 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401724 3

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401728 1

Eamonn Maguire Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center 7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017420

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017440

Eamonn Maguire
Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center
7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

HazelMurphy commented 12 years ago

No problem

I will get to this shortly.

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:30 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

Yea, unfortunately so :(

Thanks,

Eamonn

On 17 February 2012 09:28, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Apologies Eamonn I thought I had logged this under Data manager. Is there an easy way to move the issues I have logged or do I need to re log and close the wrongly allocated bugs?

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:26 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

They are all part of the same package. The data manager, validator and converter are controlled by the same source.

https://github.com/ISA-tools/ISAvalidator-ISAconverter-BIImanager

So if this is a bug in the data manager, it should be lodged here, not in the BioInvIndex. It's a separate tool.

On 17 February 2012 09:13, HazelMurphy < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

Hi Eamonn

It is not validator that is the issue, as I have not used ISAvalidator in this work. I attach some printscreens which I could not to the main issue list so you can see what I am seeing.

Regards

Hazel

-----Original Message----- From: Eamonn Maguire [mailto:reply@reply.github.com] Sent: 17 February 2012 09:10 To: Murphy, Hazel Subject: Re: [BioInvIndex] Study names displayed in order of loading not numeric order (#47)

I'm confused. The BII is displaying the studies in alphanumeric order on NEBCs instance. Do you mean the BII data manager. If so this is a different tool and this bug should be files in the ISAvalidator... repo, not here.

However, I'm not sure how much development we'll be putting into the GUI of the BII data manager from now on since the command line tools appear to be much more popular and better for loading via ssh link to the host server for BII since X11 is slow.

Thanks,

Eamonn

Eamonn Maguire Sent from my iPhone with tiny buttons

On 17 Feb 2012, at 08:43, HazelMurphy reply@reply.github.com wrote:

I have been loaded 9 ISA datasets named NEBC-S-1 through to NEBC-S-2. I would expect the datasets to be ordered in alpha-numeric order on the webfront end but this does not seem to be the case. Instead I have had to reload in numeric order. I tried reordering the Lucene Index but this has not made any difference.

Is this behaviour as expected for the current BII data manager version? If so, please could we add indexing functionality so that in future datasets are indexed in study name/number alpha numeric order regardless of data loading order. It is very likely we would want to amend records and do not want to have to reload all in order each time this is done.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017 24 3

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017 28 1

Eamonn Maguire Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center 7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401742 0

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-401744 0

Eamonn Maguire
Lead Software Engineer - ISA tools http://www.isa-tools.org

University of Oxford Tel: +44(0)1865 610788 Oxford e-Research Center
7 Keble Road, Oxford skype: maguire1986

OX1 3QG, UK

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/ISA-tools/BioInvIndex/issues/47#issuecomment-4017451