Closed lomereiter closed 7 years ago
Thanks, Artem
@althonos @Tomnl was this to keep the compatibility to mzML2ISA?
http://www.rubydoc.info/search/gems/imzml/0.1.4?q=Spectrum http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/imzml/0.1.4/ImzML/OBO/IMS
Any plans for making the vocabulary available from OLS or other ontology server? I could only find it from the following link: https://ms-imaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/imagingMS.zip thx
Thanks @lomereiter,
Is it possible to provide a link to an example imzML file where this has occurred?
Some observations on files produced by different converters:
fileContent
fileContent
and spectrum representation in the referenceableParamGroup
with id "spectrum"fileContent
and spectrum representation in each spectrum
separatelyIn practice, continuous is pretty much equivalent to profile (because spectra share the same m/z axis) and processed to centroided, but these are different concepts nevertheless.
Attached are examples for the last two conversion scenarios.
example_scils_imzml.zip example_xcalibur_pwiz_imzmlconverter.zip
Thanks for the useful information @lomereiter,
At the moment we have been relying on the "Spectrum representation" being in the file content section of the mzML or imzML file.
However, it seems quite often the "spectrum representation" is not recorded here. This actually seems to match up with the mzML schema, where the "spectrum representation" MAY be found in the
I will look into this
Hi @lomereiter, if you could test you get the expected results using this branch.
Hi all,
I will close this issue today unless anybody has any objections
Lots of imzML files we have don't contain this field in the top-level
fileContent
node. There are similar entries in IMS ontology that seem to be used more often: IMS:1000030/IMS:1000031(updated the description)