Closed dillerm closed 7 years ago
@dillerm +1 we will update the definition with your contribution, which is more precise. it will appear a new release, which is in the making.
Thank you. Glad I could help!
Thanks @dillerm! The current definition certainly needs improvement.
We currently refer to Wikipedia's definition, we could also refer to the Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms.
We also need to add the following annotations:
weighted average
I'm interested in using this class in our ontology--Apollo-SV--but noticed that it does not reflect the correct parent class and could be more descriptive.
The current definition for this class is as follows:
As such, I would like to offer the following proposed revision to see if you think it might be worth adopting:
Not sure if you would want to include that last part in the definition or as a comment so as to make the definition less clunky.