Closed Markus92 closed 1 month ago
Apologies for opening multiple issues in a day!
On the contrary, thanks for the feedback @Markus92!
The remote URI resolution indeed needs an improvement to correctly follow redirects (one or multiple). We'll work on a fix for this and I'll let you know on this issue when the update is available.
Hi @Markus92. The validator (latest docker image and our managed service) is now updated to follow all redirects.
Could you confirm from your end that all is ok so that we close the issue? Thanks!
Hi @costas80, I checked the managed service at it works as expected, It does now follow the redirect from http -> https. (using http://fdp.healthdata.nl)
thx!
Apologies for opening multiple issues in a day! We've been putting it in the hands of our users, as to say ;)
During testing of the SHACL validator, it was discovered it does not follow 301 (or other) redirects, but also does not give an error. It instead seems to return a correct result: 0 error(s), 0 warning(s), 0 message(s). When inspecting the validated content, not a lot shows up though: the HTTP body was empty.
Test URI: http://fdp.healthdata.nl; which would redirect to HTTP. Response from server when querying:
Some kind of error message on empty data might be nice, but of course it'd be even better if the redirect were to be followed.