Closed s-gbz closed 2 years ago
Hey @liam-k have you had a chance to give it another thought? (Sorry if yes and it's already been updated in FIGMA)
Did a quick little mockup (of course there should be tabs on top, it’s just the groupgenerator). Please read my comments on FIGMA as well
Also, if you could design it in a way where all 3 random generators have a similar width and height (or are responsive and don’t change width & height upon change, like it’s the case in screenario-angular right now), that would be great. I don’t know how well react-grid handles size changes coming from components internally
Also, if you could design it in a way where all 3 random generators have a similar width and height (or are responsive and don’t change width & height upon change, like it’s the case in screenario-angular right now), that would be great. I don’t know how well react-grid handles size changes coming from components internally
Surely! It was rather unfortunate, because Angular Material messed with the internal dimensions :/
Thanks for providing this idea! I like the big numbers! There's two adjustmens I will have to take though
So, no need to reinvent the Tesla completely - this is a great addition to the previous design and together it shall be glorious. Thank you! :heart:
👍 Though I think the group view of design B is large enough. If the lists are longer they’ll just expand to the bottom. And if they’re too small (which I don’t really see), you could do two columns instead of 3 or move them to the bottom altogether. I just think it’s more intuitive and much faster if you don’t have to switch between the two views, I found that to be a bit confusing in the original version. And react makes it easy to just generate the groups on the fly anyway. That’s just my 2 cents tho!
Apparently, the view for "number of groups to create" is not big enough for the client.
I don't know, feel free to go at it