Open tedhabermann opened 8 years ago
This would be a very useful addition!
That makes sense to me, and looks like the right place to insert it. The way things stand currently, you'd have to put an xlink:href with the URI on CI_Party, or do the Anchor substitution for CharacterString on the individual or organization name.
@tedhabermann to be clear you want to add an extension to CI_Party in 19115-2 to provide for this identifier i.e. create a CE_Party adding a new attribute "roleIdentifier"? from looking at the links you provided it seems to be an identifier for an individual or organization or a researcher and their activities. (to distinguish JJCool researching worm castings from JJCool studying solar flares). I think the use of roleIdentifier would confuse people with the role in CI_Responsibility. How about partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier ?
I think this is a great idea, too; And agree with Dave's suggestion to name it something like partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier, under CI_Responsibility/CI_Party
Dave, et al.,
This is a small change... not sure we need a new class (CE_Party)... Just add a new role to CI_Party... This class is used a lot, changing it could be a problem...
Ted
==== Ted Habermann ======================== Director of Earth Science, The HDF Group Voice: (217) 531-4202 Email: thabermann@hdfgroup.org ==== HDF: Software That Powers Science ====
From: Dave Danko notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> Reply-To: ISO-TC211/19115-2Revision reply@reply.github.com<mailto:reply@reply.github.com> Date: Monday, January 4, 2016 at 12:52 PM To: ISO-TC211/19115-2Revision 19115-2Revision@noreply.github.com<mailto:19115-2Revision@noreply.github.com> Cc: Ted Habermann thabermann@hdfgroup.org<mailto:thabermann@hdfgroup.org> Subject: Re: [19115-2Revision] Identifying People and Organizations (#29)
@tedhabermannhttps://github.com/tedhabermann to be clear you want to add an extension to CI_Party in 19115-2 to provide for this identifier i.e. create a CE_Party adding a new attribute "roleIdentifier"? from looking at the links you provided it seems to be an identifier for an individual or organization or a researcher and their activities. (to distinguish JJCool researching worm castings from JJCool studying solar flares). I think the use of roleIdentifier would confuse people with the role in CI_Responsibility. How about partyIdentifier 0..* :MD_Identifier ?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ISO-TC211/19115-2Revision/issues/29#issuecomment-168782036.
Identifiers spread throughout ISO 19115 and 19115-1 provide important hooks to other systems and supports the general best practice "identify early and identify often". DataCite (https://www.datacite.org) has recently published a metadata recommendation that includes identifiers for people/organizations. This idea is being implemented internationally in systems like ORCID (http://orcid.org) and is clearly important for clear and unambiguous identification of people (and organizations?).
I propose that we add a role identifier 0..* : MD_Identifier to the CI_Party class to accommodate this proposal.