search

ISO-TC211 / ISO19110

Revision of ISO19110
0 stars 0 forks source link

Inconsistency 6.2.4/6.2.2. #17

Closed jetgeo closed 9 years ago

jetgeo commented 9 years ago

Section 6.2.4. "The feature catalogue shall also include, for each feature type, its feature operations ...." is inconsistent with 6.2.2 : "A feature catalogue should include definitions and descriptions of all feature types ..., including ..., and optionally including feature operations that are supported by the data."

jetgeo commented 9 years ago

I agree, these sentences must be harmonized.

DaveDanko commented 9 years ago

Changed the requirement in 6.2.4 in the dd_smr document in dropbox adding "if they exist" i.e. : The feature catalogue SHALL include the feature operations, feature attributes, feature associations and roles associated with all feature types, if they exist.

cdobrien commented 9 years ago

Dave

If you have closed a number of issues, then I suggest you post a summary of what has been decided on the Live Link forum, or make a summary and send it to me so that I can make a WG6 N document.

There are only 17 users of GitHub for all of the TC211 work. This is only part of the number of delegates registered to these projects. I can’t figure out who is registered to 19115-2 because the registration to GitHub seems to be for all the projects, and registration is by screen name. I only know some screen names, like “shorthair”. I don’t know who is missing.

You may think you have closed issues, but there may still be more input. If there is no more input, then good, but if there is input, then by discussing it now you avoid a future ballot comment.

Doug

From: Dave Danko [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:29 PM To: ISO-TC211/ISO19110 Subject: Re: [ISO19110] Inconsistency 6.2.4/6.2.2. (#17)

Closed #17 https://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17 .

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17#event-404105425 .Description: Image removed by sender.

jetgeo commented 9 years ago

Doug: This is the 19110 revision, not 19115-2. We are a small task force trying to finish the last few details from the EC work. These issues were originally discussed only by email, but I figured using GitHub was a better solution. There is no need to collect input from others for this work.

cdobrien commented 9 years ago

Knut

Sorry wrong group.

Doug

From: Knut Jetlund [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 3:51 PM To: ISO-TC211/ISO19110 Cc: cdobrien Subject: Re: [ISO19110] Inconsistency 6.2.4/6.2.2. (#17)

Doug: This is the 19110 revision, not 19115-2. We are a small task force trying to finish the last few details from the EC work. These issues were originally discussed only by email, but I figured using GitHub was a better solution. There is no need to collect input from others for this work.

Mvh Knut Jetlund

Den 9. sep. 2015 kl. 20.36 skrev cdobrien notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>:

Dave

If you have closed a number of issues, then I suggest you post a summary of what has been decided on the Live Link forum, or make a summary and send it to me so that I can make a WG6 N document.

There are only 17 users of GitHub for all of the TC211 work. This is only part of the number of delegates registered to these projects. I can't figure out who is registered to 19115-2 because the registration to GitHub seems to be for all the projects, and registration is by screen name. I only know some screen names, like "shorthair". I don't know who is missing.

You may think you have closed issues, but there may still be more input. If there is no more input, then good, but if there is input, then by discussing it now you avoid a future ballot comment.

Doug

From: Dave Danko [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:29 PM To: ISO-TC211/ISO19110 Subject: Re: [ISO19110] Inconsistency 6.2.4/6.2.2. (#17)

Closed #17 https://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17 .

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17#event-404105425 .Description: Image removed by sender.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17#issuecomment-139000933.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ISO-TC211/ISO19110/issues/17#issuecomment-139026790 .Description: Image removed by sender.