search

ISO-TC211 / StandardsTracker

This GitHub repository lets you - our users - log and track issues that you find with our standards and other document. Tag the issue with the standard or standards effected; we will assign it to the relevant group(s) within TC 211.
11 stars 0 forks source link

WG10: Transfer nodes for freight transport #18

Open isotc211 opened 3 years ago

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

Justification: Develop a standard that extends ISO 19147, Geographic information -- Transfer nodes, for freight transfer Proposal: Develop a standard that extends ISO 19147, Geographic information -- Transfer nodes, for freight transfer

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

(In reply to ISO/TC 211 Admin from comment #0)

This request is still valid. There are identified use cases for the standardization. Some member bodies are considering to start a project. This request has been discussed at the WG10 meeting in Redlands, CA, USA on 11/28/2016.

The need for a standard in this area is strong, especially from operation point of view. There is no new work item proposal at this moment, but we might be able to get one next year.

JanHjelmager commented 1 year ago

This project is still valid. However, there is a lack of ressources.