association role "complex" is missing

ISO-TC211 / StandardsTracker

This GitHub repository lets you - our users - log and track issues that you find with our standards and other document. Tag the issue with the standard or standards effected; we will assign it to the relevant group(s) within TC 211.

11 stars 0 forks source link

association role "complex" is missing #328

Open isotc211 opened 3 years ago

isotc211 commented 3 years ago

Justification: In 10.1.3.3, the association "Complex" is bidirectional and have two association role "complex" and "element".

However, In UML, the "complex" is not defined. Proposal: Please check the model and modify if needed.