search

ISO-TC211 / StandardsTracker

This GitHub repository lets you - our users - log and track issues that you find with our standards and other document. Tag the issue with the standard or standards effected; we will assign it to the relevant group(s) within TC 211.
11 stars 0 forks source link

New standards from OMG that may be of interest to the revision of ISO 19103 CSL #412

Open MortenBorrebaek opened 2 years ago

MortenBorrebaek commented 2 years ago

OMG has recently launched too new standards on unified architecture framework, which is also submitted to ISO for DIS voting: • https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.1/DMM/PDF (Submitted as ISO/DIS 19540-1) • https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/1.1/UAFP/PDF (Submitted as ISO/DIS 19540-2)

Part 1 defines concepts, relations and viewpoints for the framework and the basis for implementation. In this context location is an important concept ( locations is becoming a generic IT concept)

Part 2 describes an UML/sysML implementation of UAF DMM and describes model and architecture capabilities.

UAF gives rules for modelling of strategic concepts like capabilities, scenarios, services, resources, persons, security, and reuse concepts from UML's metamodel, particularly on semantics.

In the model driven architecture of ISO 191xx standards UML is an important conceptual schema language. Are there elements in this unified architecture framework that could be beneficial for the revision of ISO 19103?

PeterParslow commented 2 years ago

Thanks for this.

You could provide this extra detail as a comment to N5563, as part of CIB 2021-02 - but this should also work.

heidivanparys commented 2 years ago

This has been discussed in the ISO 19103 project team. As the two mentioned standards are on the topic of enterprise architecture, but ISO 19103 is “concerned with the adoption and use of a conceptual schema language (CSL) for developing computer interpretable models, or schemas, of geographic information” and states that “Standardization of geographic information requires the use of a formal CSL to specify unambiguous schemas that can serve as a basis for data interchange and the definition of interoperable services.”, the project team sees no need to consider these standards in the revision work. They may be relevant for other work in TC 211 though.

So I would suggest removing the label “ISO 19103”, perhaps “WG 1” as well, and see if this issue should be discussed in another forum.

JanHjelmager commented 1 year ago

Given that the ISO 19103 revision project have discussed the issue and came to the conclusion that it is out of their scope, and at the same time think the issue is relevant to other project and work within TC211. The issue will be re-labeled to WG1, as suggested.