search

ISO-TC211 / StandardsTracker

This GitHub repository lets you - our users - log and track issues that you find with our standards and other document. Tag the issue with the standard or standards effected; we will assign it to the relevant group(s) within TC 211.
11 stars 0 forks source link

RDF/OWL realization of ISO 19131 #455

Open MortenBorrebaek opened 2 years ago

MortenBorrebaek commented 2 years ago

In the AHG on e-Government recommendations were made for the future revision of ISO standards and new standard projects: -ISO/TC 211 should continue to derive RDF/OWL from the harmonised UML models in the ISO/TC 211 standards. Existing activities on revising mapping rules from UML to OWL/RDF will improve the ontology and mapping rules should be an ongoing activity, according to experience from the communities. In addition, ISO/TC 211 should link to existing vocabularies and extend other vocabularies applied in e-Government with our spatial extensions where needed.

-In the revision cycles of ISO/TC 211 standards, focus should be given to investigate if there are other and more generic IT standards which it would be relevant to build geospatial extensions on top of. Of particular focus are standards from ISO/IEC JTC1 and W3C, which are most focused in e-Government communities. This comes as an extension to the cooperative work between ISO/TC 211 and OGC .

For ISO 19131 the following issue was discussed: Consider OWL/RDF realization of this standard.

magnusKarge commented 2 years ago

ISO 19131 (both the former FDIS 2020 and the FDIS 2 to be published for ballot in 2022) has an annex on "OWL encoding description" pointing to an ontology representation of its conceptual model. That ontology is supposed to be generated by GOM. So I think this will be taken care of.