This GitHub repository lets you - our users - log and track issues that you find with our standards and other document. Tag the issue with the standard or standards effected; we will assign it to the relevant group(s) within TC 211.
12
stars
0
forks
source link
ISO 19115-1 PT_FreeText: discrepancy between UML and XML? #468
<complexType name="PT_FreeText_PropertyType">
<complexContent>
<extension base="gco:CharacterString_PropertyType">
<sequence minOccurs="0"><!-- minOccurs does not match the multiplicity? -->
<element ref="lan:PT_FreeText"/>
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
Should that multiplicity be 0..* in the UML model, in order to have additional localised strings optional, and to make the XML implementation match? Or am I overlooking something?
Is there a discrepancy between the UML model for PT_FreeText and the XML schema?
Should that multiplicity be 0..* in the UML model, in order to have additional localised strings optional, and to make the XML implementation match? Or am I overlooking something?
I created this issue because of https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/application-schemas/issues/69 (note that INSPIRE uses the older schemas from ISO 19139).