In the explanatory text for People Near Protected Bikelanes, the description reads. "[X] percent within 300m...Of those, [Y] percent is within 300m of physically-protected..." I suggest removing "Of those" because it makes it sound like the second value, Y, has the first value, X, as the denominator, whereas I think the intent is that they have the same denominator, Z. I interpret they actually have the same denominator because Y is stated further up the page as the total percent of people near protected bikeways. For example, in Perth, 49% are near any bikeway, and 44% are near a protected bikeway. But from the way the text is written, it sounds like 44% of the 49% are near a protected bikeway, meaning only 22% of the total population are near a protected bikeway.
In the explanatory text for People Near Protected Bikelanes, the description reads. "[X] percent within 300m...Of those, [Y] percent is within 300m of physically-protected..." I suggest removing "Of those" because it makes it sound like the second value, Y, has the first value, X, as the denominator, whereas I think the intent is that they have the same denominator, Z. I interpret they actually have the same denominator because Y is stated further up the page as the total percent of people near protected bikeways. For example, in Perth, 49% are near any bikeway, and 44% are near a protected bikeway. But from the way the text is written, it sounds like 44% of the 49% are near a protected bikeway, meaning only 22% of the total population are near a protected bikeway.