search

ITHIM / ITHIM-R

Development of the ITHIM-R, also known as ITHIM version 3.0. Started in January 2018.
https://ithim.github.io/ITHIM-R/
GNU General Public License v3.0
17 stars 11 forks source link

Scenarios #27

Open JDWoodcock opened 6 years ago

JDWoodcock commented 6 years ago

to agree approaches to scenarios 1) trip, time, distance based depending on data 2) longer term- based on changing urban form (and consideration of move to more geographically explicit model) 3) time horizon- changes to disease burdens, emission factors, injury risks etc over time; discount rates; trajectories of uptake

robj411 commented 5 years ago

Yes, please check that also. If we arrive at different answers we might want to look into why that is.

rahulatiitd commented 5 years ago

But you could tell me if you did take care of double counting or not?

JDWoodcock commented 5 years ago

for the scenarios I suggest we combine all public transport (train, metro, bus, tram) but diagnostic purposes worth keeping them separate

robj411 commented 4 years ago

How about, instead of considering scenarios for lots of modes, we focus on one mode, and look at e.g. cycling, with 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% mode share for all cities? Internal (within city) comparisons will be made with reference to the baseline %, which will also be on the line between 0% and 10%, and we can compare the four fixed-percent results across all cities.