Open BelenZapata85 opened 6 years ago
not in the version that I've created for metahit, I'm afraid, it only has people aged 16+, and only has them in five-year age categories. possibly you could assign a one-year age at random within the five-year age categories, but if you needed people age 0-15 you would have to recreate this population somewhat from scratch. (I could share the stata do-files I used to make it, although they are a bit complicated and I'm about to go maternity leave so wouldn't be able to help, sorry)
Male | female | |
---|---|---|
16 to 19 | 1,501,912 | 1,409,630 |
20 to 24 | 1,679,888 | 1,693,330 |
25 to 29 | 1,619,781 | 1,697,836 |
30 to 34 | 1,955,658 | 1,886,827 |
35 to 39 | 1,699,478 | 1,733,095 |
40 to 44 | 1,992,422 | 2,019,258 |
45 to 49 | 1,916,881 | 1,953,731 |
50 to 54 | 1,622,863 | 1,688,346 |
55 to 59 | 1,444,598 | 1,494,450 |
60 to 64 | 1,659,153 | 1,659,954 |
65 to 69 | 1,202,281 | 1,306,021 |
70 to 74 | 983,637 | 1,060,344 |
75 to 79 | 663,644 | 1,013,242 |
80 to 84 | 496,591 | 763,873 |
85 to 89 | 334,510 | 442,230 |
90 to 94 | 127,295 | 178,555 |
95+ | 36,881 | 51,425 |
Thanks Anna, we only need adults. I will start by trying to work from the age groups, which I believe will be possible, I need to check road trauma estimates with @robj411 . Rob, is it possible to have matching estimates of numbers from your model to the age groups? thanks, Belen
Hi Belen, OK great. You could use this data https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/dc1117ew if you wanted to model more exactly the distribution of single-year ages within five-year age bands (e.g. there are probably slightly more 70 year olds than 74 year olds, because of mortality). But that is quite possibly overkill... Anna
@BelenZapata85
my sense is that you should develop this based on the likely available data - wich in your case, it seems realistic that users will have 1-year data for age and deaths. So I think there will be a by-pass to the aggregation steps for the synthetic popupulation, rather than a (random) re-assigning of 1-year ages.
Question for you though: what other data do you use (that is specific to the PMSLT approach) and at what level of aggregation?
@JDWoodcock
Thanks @gotom22 (@JDWoodcock) , yes, seems realistic to think that users will have one-year population and mortality data. If not, for population data, we can work with 5-year age groups and mortality could be interpolated (interpolation method is not in the code yet).
I am working on defining data inputs for the PMSLT. For some of the data there is a two step process from GBD data to data that is suitable for the model derived with Dismod II (but other methods to be discussed). I am working on Figure 3 in here https://github.com/ITHIM/ITHIM-R/blob/master/MSLT/MSLTdoc.Rmd. The issue is that for most cities we only have country level data, so scaling options from country level to city level will be discussed with @nmaizlish
sounds good!
In terms of structure/terminology:
...ideally this aligns with how you code and document...
For the PMSLT we need population numbers per one year age group and sex for a given year from age 0 to 100. That is to say, we need the distribution of the total population in one year age group by sex. @AnnaGoodman1 will such data be available from the synthetic population?
Thanks, Belen