ITISFoundation / osparc-simcore

🐼 osparc-simcore simulation framework
https://osparc.io
MIT License
43 stars 27 forks source link

🐛⬆️Osparc-gateway-server: missing requirements update #5868

Closed sanderegg closed 4 months ago

sanderegg commented 4 months ago

What do these changes do?

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 79.3%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (736a716). Report is 218 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files [![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=h1rOE8q7ic&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5868 +/- ## ======================================== - Coverage 84.5% 79.3% -5.3% ======================================== Files 10 8 -2 Lines 214 383 +169 Branches 25 0 -25 ======================================== + Hits 181 304 +123 - Misses 23 79 +56 + Partials 10 0 -10 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integrationtests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `79.3% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 18 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5868/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation)