🐛Dask sidecar: disable concurrent pulling of files until new version is out

sanderegg commented 1 month ago

What do these changes do?

https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/issues/5900 showed that if a user runs a computational service with multiple inputs, and these inputs have the same file name, there is a risk of collision. Therefore this PR disable concurrent pulling of inputs (this will slightly reduce execution performance but will ensure that there is no collision).

Bonus:

removing puppeteer-based sleeper test
Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

[x] No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 73.5%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (16f8014). Report is 255 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

[![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=h1rOE8q7ic&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5912 +/- ## ========================================= - Coverage 84.5% 73.5% -11.1% ========================================= Files 10 128 +118 Lines 214 7013 +6799 Branches 25 0 -25 ========================================= + Hits 181 5158 +4977 - Misses 23 1855 +1832 + Partials 10 0 -10 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integrationtests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `73.5% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 138 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5912/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation)