🎨E2E: improvements on ClassicTIP test

[sanderegg]

What do these changes do?

• refactored ClassicTI e2e test
• use websocket events and expected requests to better check when actions are completed
• added makefile target to easily run the tip_plan tests (make test-tip-anywhere)
• renamed to test_tip_plan.py to follow pytest best practices -> requires updates in e2e-backend repo
• now autoscaled system compatible (works against tip.science)
• exceptions in context are now showing the trace (makes debugging much easier)

Bonus:

• fixed monitoring clusters to be compatible with tip.science ssh key pattern
• removed makefile and drawio extension from recommended list as this was plagging vscode

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• [x] No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 87.9%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (347013d). Report is 284 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5955?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5955 +/- ## ========================================= + Coverage 84.5% 87.9% +3.3% ========================================= Files 10 1324 +1314 Lines 214 55193 +54979 Branches 25 1340 +1315 ========================================= + Hits 181 48539 +48358 - Misses 23 6368 +6345 - Partials 10 286 +276 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5955/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integrationtests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5955/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `64.6% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5955/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation) | `85.8% <ø> (+1.3%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 1284 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ITISFoundation/osparc-simcore/pull/5955/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ITISFoundation)