Does adapting this to use with scATACseq make sense, with coordinates instead of genes?

[ahdee]

Hi I'm wondering if this sounds a bit strange or do you think it will work.

We have 10x scATACseq the data structure essentially is the same only difference is that instead of genes they are coordinates.

chr1-9811-10709    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... 

chr1-180671-181852 . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......

I plan to SCT transform this and on the excel sheet database add in coordinates instead of genes for "cell type" I want to enrich for.

Would this work or even make sense?

thanks.

[IanevskiAleksandr]

Dear @ahdee,

Yes, this should work.

BR, Aleksandr