Closed CoolCat467 closed 3 months ago
Where did you found "negative" field? The reviews
endpoint query code is
SELECT
reviews.id,
reviews.rating,
reviews.comment,
UNIX_TIMESTAMP(reviews.timestamp) AS `timestamp`,
users.name AS user_name,
(
SELECT CONCAT(
'{total=',
COUNT(reviews_votes.rating),
', positive=',
SUM(reviews_votes.rating),
'}'
)
FROM reviews_votes
WHERE reviews_votes.review_id = reviews.id
) AS votes
FROM
reviews
LEFT JOIN users ON reviews.user_id = users.id
LEFT JOIN publications ON reviews.publication_id = publications.id
LEFT JOIN files ON file_id = files.id
WHERE files.id = $fileID
ORDER BY reviews.id DESC
LIMIT $offset, $count
Response for MineCode:
{success=true,result={[1]={id=1614,user_name="CACKE",rating=5,comment="Иконка имба",timestamp=1711642113},[2]={id=1451,user_name="matveyminer",rating=5,comment="Идеально!",timestamp=1690707383,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[3]={id=1382,user_name="mikinl",rating=3,comment="Если удалить последний символ в строке программа вылетает и не сохраняется",timestamp=1672877067,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[4]={id=1154,user_name="kogtyv",rating=5,comment="В новой версии возможно писать только тогда, когда переустановиш ОС.",timestamp=1625739246,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[5]={id=645,user_name="Pidorok",rating=5,comment="Cool app! Bro!",timestamp=1548267037,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[6]={id=573,user_name="Fronun",rating=5,comment="лучше чем команда edit, она удобная это плюс а вторых не прПриложение удобная, ещё сделали оконный режим, это удобно, хочется чтобы можно было сделать свои шаблоны, ибо приходится снова писать local GUI = require(\"GUI\")",timestamp=1539850574,votes={total=1,positive=0}},[7]={id=550,user_name="Xylic",rating=5,comment="Оконный режим, кстати, удобнее фуллскрина, за эт спасибо. Хотя я еще бы не отказался от автогенерации по типу require либ и шаблонов for ... do",timestamp=1536841157,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[8]={id=479,user_name="WattanaGaming",rating=3,comment="this program is somewhat a big ass memory hogger when loading up a big file. and it need some more feature like autocomplete and support for other language(Seriously it need this). but at the time its very good except at editing plain text",timestamp=1529596315,votes={total=1,positive=1}},[9]={id=463,user_name="FederAndInk",rating=4,comment="Really cool :) but ctrl+z is missing :P",timestamp=1527539245,votes={total=2,positive=2}},[10]={id=41,user_name="RamzesTheSecond",rating=5,comment="Красивенько",timestamp=1517160518,votes={total=2,positive=2}},[11]={id=30,user_name="ZPMPowered",rating=5,comment="Фига во что майн превратился! Эх, вернуться что ли на Баттекс?",timestamp=1516531784,votes={total=2,positive=2}},[12]={id=29,user_name="EndDJ",rating=5,comment="А мне нрав <3",timestamp=1516531784,votes={total=2,positive=2}},[13]={id=28,user_name="Pirnogion",rating=5,comment="ебать",timestamp=1516531784,votes={total=3,positive=1}}}}
Btw API is non-opensource, shitty-coded, and no further help with it will be provided. So if you need, do reverse engineering by yourself xd
Thank you, sorry, I should have looked closer into the actual response on my end instead of making assumptions.
Why is it that
reviews
market api endpoint has conflicting data about number of helpful votes sometimes? For example, review id216
says following:Votes says there are 1 positive vote and 0 negative votes, but somehow total is 5 votes? Does that mean there were 4 votes that were deleted or something?