Open ddubin65 opened 8 years ago
A proposed account of DCMI terms as OWL2 ontologies is here: http://bloody-byte.net/rdf/dc_owl2dl/
The dcmi type vocabulary that includes Dataset is here: http://purl.org/NET/dc_owl2dl/dcmitype
But they keep the DCMI URIs. What if we kept the standrad URI for Dataset but imported the bloody-byte account into Protege?
The correct URI is http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Dataset And the class identity is rdfs:Class, not owl:Class. Does that present a problem for reasoning with Protege?