Closed dagmendez closed 4 months ago
I'm unsure about the goal of it. Empty
implies Blank
(althrough the given Implication
is not present in the codebase) so Not[Blank]
already implies Not[Empty]
.
Therefore, NonEmpty
is just Not[Empty]
with a description so what is its purpose compared to just using Not[Empty]
?
Closed due to inactivity. See #214
Hello 👋🏼
Have you consider including a
NonEmpty
as astring
constrain?In the project I am working right now we have defined the type as follows:
type NonEmptyString = String :| Not[Empty]
We use it as a control type until we come up with a better refinement. It can be useful for early phases of design.
Thank you!