[0.9] The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction.
Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions
[0.9] Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work
[0.9] Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made
[0.8] Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc.
[0.9] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning.
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.
Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
Final Score: 0.875
Great Job! Could put more work into emphasizing key commits. Keep it up :)
Team Review "Tanav" grading "Ronit"
Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions
[0.9] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning.
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.
Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
Final Score: 0.875
Great Job! Could put more work into emphasizing key commits. Keep it up :)