Closed jcfr closed 8 months ago
Related pull request:
@jcfr sorry, I missed this earlier. I misunderstood the guidance, based on my incomplete read of the documentation ...
A subsequent commit will address this issue by updating the workflow to detect secret unavailability and prompt developers to request write access to the project instead.
How difficult is this to do? Can you point us to the relevant resources, if you do not have time to work on this?
A subsequent commit
Did you mean to say "a subsequent PR"? Should this be merged first?
A subsequent commit will address this issue by updating the workflow to detect secret unavailability and prompt developers to request write access to the project instead.
This will indeed done in a later commit added to https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-index-data/pull/5
In the meantime, I suggest you:
ImagingDataCommons
organization)grant @vkt1414 write access
This is done now. I somehow did not think to check this on Friday, just assuming that Vamsi has the permissions. We will test this now.
This commit reverts the changes introduced in commit 4aa6655b9, which modified the CI workflow to use
pull_request_target
for accessing repository secrets during pull request testing.Originally, the intention was to grant access to repository secrets within the pull request environment. However, using
pull_request_target
caused the workflow to run against the base branch instead of the proposed changes in the pull request.To maintain secure code review practices and avoid insecure workarounds, this commit restores the previous workflow behavior. A subsequent commit will address this issue by updating the workflow to detect secret unavailability and prompt developers to request write access to the project instead.