Closed MuyuenHoshino closed 1 year ago
We actually used the improved TE Annotation (66.47%) instead of EDTA to extract different types of TEs, because EDTA only annotated around 46% in the Vitis genus. Perhaps you can consider using this Pan-genome TE Annotation Pipeline to enhance your results of TE detection. The pipeline I shared serves as an example to demonstrate how we can identify centromeres through TRF, TE, and Gene annotations. Additionally, EDTA can also be used for centromere identification (Copia, Gypsy, and Helitron are acceptable).
Dear Immortal2333, Thanks for your prompt reply,and sorry for not being on github these days You are so generous in sharing knowledge Best wishes
Dear Immortal2333, I runned EDTA and get
This is the sum of TE annoation.It's the same as this plot in your paper.
So which part is the
genome.mod.EDTA.TEanno.gff3
.And then I usegrep
to extract keywords.I got results ofCopia, Gypsy, Helitron
correctly but when I usegrep 'MULE-MuDR' genome.mod.EDTA.TEanno.gff3 > TE_MULE-MuDR.split.gff3
,I got an empty file.And there is also nothing about MULE-MuDR ingenome.mod.EDTA.TEanno.gff3
.MULE-MuDR
? What am I doing wrong? Hope to get your help.(By the way,may i know how you drew this line chart?) Best wishes