Closed ghar1821 closed 1 year ago
Faster UMAP would be most excellent.
@tomashhurst Implemented a new faster umap. Install the new dev branch and use run.fast.umap
function. I tested it and the result looks fine, albeit orientated differently than the original umap implementation. The run time though is crazy fast. 1 minute for 50,000 cells.
@ghar1821 I'm using run.fast.umap
pretty much exclusively now, excellent job!
dev branch
Hi, Thank you so much for introducing this amazing improvement. Could I ask if the current version of uwot still provides the function "run.fast.umap" or it is been combined in "umap2"? "Install the new dev branch and use run.fast.umap function" - I was trying to perform this but couldn't find any relevant information in the uwot github page. Could you please give me some directions? Many thanks in advance!
Hi there,
The run.fast.umap
function is the function that we have in our Spectre package. It is not a function within the uwot package itself. This function (Spectre::run.fast.umap()
) make use of uwot's umap function (uwot::umap())
.
I hope this makes sense.
Also another thing, we will be depreciating the run.fast.umap
soon as the implementation is already merged into our existing run.umap
function.
Consider using the uwot package as there seem to be support to run calculation in parallel, which will substantially improve the run time. See: https://github.com/jlmelville/uwot